Dan on Twitter

Okay everyone - I've bitten the bullet. I'm not sure why, but I've created a Twitter account. Now I suppose folks can follow my mundane thoughts throughout the day ("Wow, that pasta was just marvelous" or "Phew, got to the toilet just in time" etc.).

Alternatively, you can use it to get notified of my newest blog posts.

My twitter account is http://twitter.com/#!/dandjurdjevic.

Comments

  1. Peter PJune 18, 2011 at 10:06 PM

    I think that the alternative option is the optional one. By the way during those days i will probably order the book you suggested me (Okinawan Karate by Mark Bishop). Thanks again.

    PS1. I don't have twitter(mainly because i am not into the whole social networking thing)

    PS2. Your blog is great.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dan DjurdjevicJune 19, 2011 at 10:25 AM

    Thanks Peter. Yes, do buy that book. It is a very good summary of the major systems of Okinawan karate. You might be interested in this discussion, however there is no question that the book is still highly useful.

    ReplyDelete
  3. hermannJune 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM

    Keep up the blogging, please.
    You surely will understand that not everyone is following you on twitter, yes?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dan DjurdjevicJune 19, 2011 at 5:46 PM

    Yes.

    ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ymar SakarJune 20, 2011 at 8:07 AM

    I think you should read this article, Dan. I believe you will find it fascinating in a training methodology sense.

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/05/11/090511fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all


    Can hard work beat natural genius?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ymar SakarJune 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM

    http://www.joannazorya.com/

    I found out today she had died. Her videos on youtube gave me the first explanation of taiji quan that I could make sense of on the subject.

    Her training methodology reminds me strikingly of yours. She also studied in Taiwan, just as you did for a time.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dan DjurdjevicJune 21, 2011 at 2:05 PM

    Thanks for that Ymar. I'll look up her videos.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mohammad Raza KhanFebruary 19, 2012 at 11:24 AM

    Very nice link to the NewYorker, Ymar. It was an exciting read.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Combat tai chi"? Seriously?

Image
Back in about 2009 I was talking to a friend of mine who does krav maga, telling him I was off to Taiwan to train in combat taijiquan (tai chi). He laughed. "Combat tai chi? Isn't that an oxymoron?" I can see why he thought that. Because when you look at the soft, slow art of taijiquan, adding the descriptor "combat" does seem to be a contradiction in terms. In fact, the idea of it being used for fighting can appear  ludicrously funny . And to be frank, in the case of most taiji practitioners - including many who profess "fighting skill" on the interwebs   - it almost certainly is. [In the case of the preceding link, note the string attacks against zombie opponents - more on that later!] By now, I doubt there is anyone in the martial arts who hasn't heard of the debacle that constituted the recent fight between MMA fighter Xu Xiadong and self-described Yang style taijiquan "master" Wei Lei. Xu beat Wei senseless in under 10
Read more

Understanding the internal arts

Image
More about the “soft” arts of China and the nature of “qi” In my article “ Internal vs. external martial arts ” I explain that the term “internal” is a reference to neijiaquan ("internal method fist") – a group of martial arts in China comprising taijiquan, baguazhang and xingyiquan, as well as some related arts and offshoots (eg. liu he ba fa and yi quan). These are easily identifiable arts with a very specific set of techniques based on common principles. The internal arts are commonly distinguished from other arts (named waijiaquan or “external method fist”). Many argue that this distinction arises because the former rely on “qi” (“ki” in Japanese) – a term literally meaning “breath” and often used to describe a metaphysical “energy”. Accordingly the term “internal” is often mistakenly seen as a reference to the “cultivation of qi internally”. In fact the word is just a reference to “inner family” in much the same way as some schools use the term “inner circle”: so ne
Read more

Karate punches vs. boxing punches

Image
Introduction In my article “ Kime: the soul of the karate punch ” I described the essential feature of the karate punch as being “focus” – ie. a combination of minimal deceleration before impact and optimum distancing – usually performed in karate with a straight thrust . Many have, and will continue to, argue that this straight thrust is less powerful than a boxer’s follow-through punches. This is true. But to understand why this does not necessarily mean that the former is less effective we’ll have to examine punching methods – what someone I know calls “delivery systems” – in greater detail. To the extent that karate punching is “less powerful”, I will then go on to examine why this is a tactical choice rather than a necessary failing. Categorising punches In a very general sense karate punches can be divided into 2 kinds: straight line and curved. In boxing, punches can be divided into 2 different categories that overlap with the karate ones, namely: 1. jabs (ie. punches which
Read more