"Deflecting attacks doesn't require any specialised training!"
Where angels fear to tread
All I can say is, I realised after a few minutes why I don't frequent forums any more.
Despite my own promises I couldn't resist replying to one train of thought by a certain "rne02" who raised that old chestnut: "There are no blocks!". I've dealt with that subject exhaustively and if you haven't read my article on the subject, then I encourage you to do so here.
But another writer, "jwt", did go on to say some related things that demand separate analysis. Here are a few quotes:
Then there's jwt's extract from his unpublished book. I've highlighted the parts that I find most astonishing:
What? Deflections and parries don't require specialised movement? They require little training? They aren't "designed to nagivate the most common problems posed by violent incidents"?
|Respected instructor Han-Kurt Schaefer applies the same |
deflection from bagua that I use in the opening photo -
but does it in free sparring.
Jwt's other point about "the best form of defence is offence" is something I've done to death (see "Attack, attack, attack" and the "Boards don't hit back" series) so I won't go into that.
Instead, what I thought I would go into - for jwt's sake and others, is exactly how standard "uke" help you develop the subtle, complex and useful - indeed vital - skill of deflection/parrying:
What traditional uke teach you
In my experience, the standard uke forms teach angles and planes of interception and deflection (among other things). When applied as deflections/parries, they are much "smaller" versions of the "formal" basic movements.
I've been applying deflections against realistic attacks for more than 3 decades. I make them work reasonably well. I can't imagine having whatever level of skill I have now without learning traditional forms of uke (from karate and the Chinese arts). These have taught me how to "naturally slip and parry".
|An age uke applied by me in sparring|
Yes, we have an ingrained "flinch reflex" which comprises a retraction of the body and an extension of the arms to ward off danger.
|Another applied age uke - this time by Jeff|
We might start with the flinch reflex. But we have to modify it so as to make the movement both effective and efficient. This requires grooving your body to respond along optimal angles and planes.
So assuming that the angle and plane of a deflection/parry need to be taught, I can see precisely why it is prudent to "magnify" them for a student (especially a beginner) so they can be better examined, studied and understood.
In other words, I can see why we might want to use some larger, more formal movements (ie. "uke") to teach deflection.
The alternative is to persist with teaching the student some tiny circular/sliding movement (which is what applied uke actually become).
|Jeff applies both a gedan barai and age uke in sparring|
We apply these principles in unscripted sparring from which the stills in the essay are taken.
|I apply a gedan barai in sparring|
I note that the students who best understand the traditional deflections are the ones who routinely apply them effectively and efficiently (low impact, good deflection). The better they are, the less "swatting" you see.
Sure, fighting is messy and nothing like basic form. But what makes these adjacent images anything other than an applied "traditional uke"?
I wouldn't dispute that you can use uke for strikes/locks etc. But I don't understand why some feel they play no role in teaching students how to better "slip" and "parry" attacks - especially when the science of deflection is so complex (and when traditional uke contain so many compound movements that seem to correspond very neatly to the planes/angles you need to deflect/parry)?
"Swatting like any untrained person" is very far from the pinnacle of martial arts deflection. Rather, it is just inefficient, ineffective form.
In my experience, an understanding a basic chudan uke in a formal setting lets you move to unscripted "slipping" and "parrying" (not "swatting") by absorbing the principle of the basic and with a much smaller, less "formal" movement.
The graduated path to developing effective, efficient deflections
The training proceeds in a graduated way.
We start by performing chudan uke "in the air" in a basic stance.
Then we apply it against a formal, basic punch in the manner of the gif below. We groove it in that context until the student is able to slip the punch effortlessly (and with as little "telegraphing" or "feedback" to his partner as possible).
Note that "hard blocks" are usually the result of nothing more than bad timing: there are very few instances where it isn't preferable to have a contact that is barely registered by your opponent as his or her punch is deflected.
The more feedback you give (in the form of an impact) the less efficient your deflection has been (some force is being used in the "hard" contact) and the more "on notice" your opponent is that something is happening.
This is a basic chudan uke - but the performance here
relies on a great deal of training: it requires skill.
Too many people get caught up in "punishing" their opponent's attacking arm (something they default to as beginners) - then trying to justify this as some form of traditional "objective" - a beast people now call "hard blocks".
But it is my view that, apart from mistakes and the odd exceptional use of a block to "punish" a limb for tactical purposes (where you don't want to hurt the person or something - who knows?), "hard blocks" don't exist as a traditional martial arts method. They are just "soft deflections done wrong".
Okay, so you've grooved your soft deflection with a partner in basic standing or one step sparring. You think it's coming along nicely.
Now it's time to start gradually adding realism.
First we might make the punches less formal - more "realistic" - say by using a jab or a haymaker. This isn't "realism" but it does remove the artificiality of the "karate punch". (Note, my video concerns the hiki uke - open hand version - but the same principle is in effect.)
And we do it for all our arts. Here is one from taijiquan:
Here's one from baguazhang:
From there we increase the pace and the intent to something a bit rougher. As messy as the fighting gets, the principles of interception/parrying are in constant evidence (even if "literal uke" aren't).
Graduated training of this kind is how you get to build up to applying and using deflections/parries/blocks.
Given that this process is not followed by many schools, I'm not surprised that their "blocks" are little more than "swatting movements" - the kind a beginner would do. They haven't developed the skill. And I have trained many such martial artists; you know they haven't got the skill (despite years of training) because even against a slow moving partner who is being utterly predictable, they can't slip the punch efficiently or effectively - they keep clashing their arms. The ability to "slip" eludes them...
What troubles me is not that some practitioners have yet to develop one of the most vital skills of traditional martial arts. Instead it troubles me that, rather than acquire these skills (or at least accept that they haven't developed them yet), they attempt to rewrite their art's foundations so as to deny the very existence of deflection as a skill that needs to be developed through hard work: of gong fu. Rather, any beginner's swatting is just as good.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Copyright © 2014 Dejan Djurdjevic
Post a Comment