Back to basics: stances

Introduction

Some time ago I wrote the article "The role of traditional stances", however I have never attempted to describe these in any real detail (although I have previously discussed stances and stepping in stances in various articles, eg. "Northern and southern kung fu, karate and the question of range").

So following my last post about basic blocks, I thought I'd describe how to assume the basic stances of karate (and most other traditional martial arts):

Heisoku dachi (attention stance)



Feet together, weight evenly distributed.

Musubi dachi (V stance)



Heels together, feet out at angles, weight evenly distributed.

Heiko dachi (parallel stance)



Feet parallel, shoulder width, weight evenly distributed.

Hachiji dachi (figure 8 stance)



Feet angled outwards, shoulder width, weight evenly distributed.

Zenkutsu dachi / gong bu (forward stance)



Feet shoulder width, weight 70% on front foot, 30% on back, front shin vertical, outside edge of front foot pointing forwards, back foot angled outwards.

Sanchin dachi / sanzhan bu (3 battles stance)



Feet shoulder width, weight evenly distributed, heel of front foot and toes of back foot on the same line, outside edge of back foot pointing forwards, front foot angled slightly inwards.


A video on sanchin dachi

Further reading:
The naming of sanchin
Grounding
Sanchin in the Chinese arts"
Naha te and its Chinese cousins

Neko ashi dachi (cat stance)



Front foot in line with the middle of your back foot, one foot distance between the heel of your front foot and the line drawn by the toes of your back foot, weight 90% on back foot, 10% on front pointing forward, heel lifted, back foot angled outwards.

Further reading:
The enigma of tiger mouth in cat stance

Shiko dachi (sumo stance)



Feet angled outwards, 1½ to 2 shoulder widths, weight evenly distributed, shins vertical.

Kiba dachi (horse stance)



Feet pointing forwards, 1½ to 2 shoulder widths, weight evenly distributed, knees oriented naturally in line with the feet.

Further reading:
The 'naihanchi stance'",

Kokutsu dachi (back stance)



Front foot in line with the heel of the back foot, 1½ to 2 shoulder widths in length, weight distributed 60% on the back leg, 40% on the front.

Renoji dachi (tick stance)



Front foot in line with the middle of your back foot, one foot distance between the heel of your front foot and the line drawn by the toes of your back foot, weight evenly distributed, front foot pointing forward, back foot angled outwards (a "lazy cat stance").

"Open" zenkutsu dachi / bai bu



Oriented like a zenkutsu dachi except that the front foot is angled outwards.

Seisan dachi / zhan bu



Feet are one fist distance apart, 1½ shoulder widths in length, weight distributed slightly to the back leg, front foot pointing forwards and the back foot angled outwards.

Further reading:
Xingyi stepping vs. karate stepping
Sanchin in the Chinese arts"
Naha te and its Chinese cousins

Copyright © 2011 Dejan Djurdjevic

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karate punches vs. boxing punches

Image
Introduction In my article “ Kime: the soul of the karate punch ” I described the essential feature of the karate punch as being “focus” – ie. a combination of minimal deceleration before impact and optimum distancing – usually performed in karate with a straight thrust . Many have, and will continue to, argue that this straight thrust is less powerful than a boxer’s follow-through punches. This is true. But to understand why this does not necessarily mean that the former is less effective we’ll have to examine punching methods – what someone I know calls “delivery systems” – in greater detail. To the extent that karate punching is “less powerful”, I will then go on to examine why this is a tactical choice rather than a necessary failing. Categorising punches In a very general sense karate punches can be divided into 2 kinds: straight line and curved. In boxing, punches can be divided into 2 different categories that overlap with the karate ones, namely: 1. jabs (ie. punches which
Read more

"Combat tai chi"? Seriously?

Image
Back in about 2009 I was talking to a friend of mine who does krav maga, telling him I was off to Taiwan to train in combat taijiquan (tai chi). He laughed. "Combat tai chi? Isn't that an oxymoron?" I can see why he thought that. Because when you look at the soft, slow art of taijiquan, adding the descriptor "combat" does seem to be a contradiction in terms. In fact, the idea of it being used for fighting can appear  ludicrously funny . And to be frank, in the case of most taiji practitioners - including many who profess "fighting skill" on the interwebs   - it almost certainly is. [In the case of the preceding link, note the string attacks against zombie opponents - more on that later!] By now, I doubt there is anyone in the martial arts who hasn't heard of the debacle that constituted the recent fight between MMA fighter Xu Xiadong and self-described Yang style taijiquan "master" Wei Lei. Xu beat Wei senseless in under 10
Read more

Zhan zhuang: grounding, structure, intention and qi

Image
Introduction There is a tendency in the Chinese, and increasingly in the Japanese, martial arts to venerate “standing post” training - what is known as zhan zhuang (站樁 - literally “standing like a post”).  In particular the internal arts of China are known for this practise.  Even more particularly, the art of yiquan (意拳 - literally “concept fist”) focuses almost entirely on this as a martial training method. Yiquan, which is also called “da cheng quan” (大成拳 - literally “great achievement boxing”), was developed by xingyiquan master Wang Xiangzhai (26 November 1885 - 12 July 1963).  One of his students was the Taiwan-based martial artist Wang Shujin (a master of xingyiquan, baguazhang and taijiquan who happens to have also been one of my grandmaster Chen Pan Ling's main students). In Japan the yiquan tradition was continued by Kenichi Sawai, founder of the school of taikiken (体気拳 - literally “mind and spirit fist”). So what is the point of “standing post training”?  Can
Read more