The naming of "sanchin"


Further to my article on the numeric names of kata:

In Chinese schools (eg. ngo cho kun) the kata is called "saam chien / sanzhan" while the stance is called "chien be / zhan bu" (battle stance) . The latter is probably the more "correct" description/name of the stance. By comparison, in karate we could perhaps call sanchin dachi "chin dachi".


The kata name "sanchin" means "3 battles" and my theory is that the "battles" referred to are not "mind/body/spirit" or some other elaborate philosophical concept. Rather, I think the explanation is more straightforward: The kata is named after 3 sanchin dachi steps:Given my thoughts on the pragmatic kata naming conventions in Fujian in the 1800s (again, see my article Numeric names of kata) I think the present kata name is shortened from the full Chinese name of the kata: "san zhan bu / saam chien be" — ie. “3 battle steps”. In this regard, bear in mind that the kata is performed with 3 forward "battle steps" in most of its incarnations - in Okinawa and China.

Because the number 3 in sanchin is already qualified by "battles", it would have been easy to drop off the "bu" or “step” from the kata name. Note that other numeric Okinawan kata names are commonly referred to in their shortened form — eg. sanseru, sesan, etc — even if their formal name is accompanied by “te” etc.



Ockham's razor would favour the simplest explanation for the meaning of “sanchin” and I feel this is it.

However a complicating feature in relation to the naming of sanchin stance and kata is that it is possible that the stance derives from the stance used in xingyiquan's "san ti" (3 heavens) posture - a stance I am told is sometimes referred to as "zhan bu" or "chien be" - ie. "battle stance (see above).


The stance used in the "san ti" posture corresponds to what is known as "seisan dachi" in IOGKF (in seisan at the point of the uppercut). The IOGKF seisan dachi is a longer version of the seisan dachi used in the shorin schools - which in turn happens to be identical to the sanzhan used in many Fujian white crane schools, including Yong Chun (back foot is out, front foot straight) — see my article titled Seisan — the universal kata?.

I think it is very likely that the long history of associating the number "3" with the stance that we now know as "sanchin" makes it hard to be sure whether the chicken came before the egg...

For more information related to this topic, see: Sanchin in Chinese martial arts.

Copyright © 2008 Dejan Djurdjevic

Comments

  1. I love your thoughts on sanchin. I've been fortunate to appreciate so many styles and their stances that I've found sanchin to be practically universal in and of itself. Boxing, Wing Chun, JKD and any other style worth its salt utilizes the sanchin thought of grounding oneself. I've also felt that any slight variation of any basic stance can open up new and interesting stances(tai chi concept) Either way, i think these arts/sciences need to look around and really appreciate each other for what they really are. . .THOUGHTS. . .that compliment each other. Like when I tell my students "Here's a thought," I'm often referring to experience or acquired knowledge of "The Arts" seldom that of my own original system. I just wish people would embrace their own style with the good thoughts of those around them to bring out the best of every art. Impressive in depth articles Dan. Keep doin what your doin because You Make Us Better :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks mate - I really appreciate the support and encouragement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If I am not mistaken, the 3 battles means Childhood, Adulthood and Old age...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have not heard this before Zen. Thanks for writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karate punches vs. boxing punches

"Combat tai chi"? Seriously?

Zhan zhuang: grounding, structure, intention and qi